Steven Moffat may get a perverse pleasure out of playing the secrets of his shows as close to the vest as humanly possible, but when you’re the man behind Sherlock and Doctor Who, you can afford to be a little cheeky. Right before the first series of Sherlock premiered in the States, I was fortunate enough to chat with Moffat and his cohort behind the scenes, Mark Gatiss, when they were at the TCA press tour, and it was a highly enjoyable experience. As such, when I was pitched the opportunity to write a cover story for Vancouver’s TV Week on the return of the show, I’d knew Moffat would make for a good interview…and I was not wrong. Alas, TV Week does not put its pieces online, but for your reading enjoyment, here’s the full transcript of the conversation…
News Reviews Interviews: Well, I’m thrilled, as is my wife and most everyone I know, that Sherlock is finally coming back.
Steven Moffat: [Laughs.] Well, good!
NRI: How pleasantly surprised were you when the first series became such a hit?
SM: Oh, well, “shocked” is probably the word, really. I mean, you certainly couldn’t anticipate this level of thing, because it’s enormous. Mark (Gatiss) and I and…I think Sue (Vertue) as well, but certainly Mark and I talked about it. We reckoned an audience of maybe four million, lots of very good reviews, and maybe an award from an obscure festival would about cover it. And we would’ve regarded that as a hit. And it would’ve been a hit, but we thought it would be a snob hit. We thought it would be relatively small-scale. But the fact that it became an instant phenomenon in the UK, and then just about everywhere, has been…a proper shock, yeah.
NRI: Given that you and Mark are walking Sherlock Holmes encyclopedias…
SM: Well, we’re pretty good, yeah. [Laughs.]
NRI: …how far in advance, if only in your heads, plan out the series? Did you already have an idea for what Series Two would be?
SM: Um…we had one pretty quickly. I mean, not immediately. But the broad building blocks of “Scandal (in Belgravia),” “The Hounds (of Baskerville),” and “The (Reichenbach) Fall,” we had to do those, because they’re the three huge stories. Particularly “The Hounds.” That’s about as huge as it gets. So it’s a case of…well, we know we progress slowly in this show. It’s always gonna be long gaps between show runs, so there’s not a lot of point in just doing it for our pleasure. Might as well get the biggies up front. I was excited about doing the Irene Adler non-love story, and Mark was excited about doing “Hounds,” so, yeah, we had a plan pretty quickly.
NRI: You’d said before the series premiered in the States that the Sherlock Holmes Society had been thrilled with the results of the modernization of the Holmes mythos. Did you give them an advance screening of the second series?
SM: Uh, no. [Laughs.] We didn’t. Some years before, though, we were invited…or, rather, Mark was invited…to address the Sherlock Holmes Society, just in his role as a very prominent writer and actor and a Sherlock Holmes fan. So he addressed the Society as a guest, and at that time – because we’d already been talking about it – he said, “We have this idea to do a modernized Sherlock Holmes,” and, you know, they were all really, really keen on the idea and very crazy about it. We thought they’d be more sort of fuddy-duddy about it, but they really weren’t. They were really quite excited about it. And a few years later, just during the transmission of the second series (in the UK), I addressed the Sherlock Holmes Society with Mark as my date. [Laughs.] And they were all just thrilled with it. They were delighted with it. They’re not at all conservative in their appreciation of Sherlock Holmes. They like it if you change things up a bit.
















